La impresora de la foto de Canon i9900 proporciona a una solución de alta calidad, versátil para los entusiastas de la foto y a profesionales de poco volumen de la foto. Esta máquina discreta, reservada ofrece el formato amplio que imprime (hasta 13 por 19 pulgadas) así como 4 impresiones borderless rápidas de by-6-inch adentro tan poco como 38 segundos. Para los resultados verdad profesional-que miran, la impresora también apoya resoluciones hasta el dpi 4.800 x 1.200.
 |
| Impresión directamente de las cámaras fotográficas directas de PictBridge y de BubbleJet. Ninguna PC requirió. |
El i9900 utiliza un ocho-color, sistema separado del color del tanque de la tinta para aumentar la gama de la reproducción del color. Los sensores así que tú de esta del multi-tanque de la tecnología bajo-tinta de las características no funcionaréis seco en el medio de una impresión y no te ahorráis dinero dejándote substituir solamente el color que ha funcionado hacia fuera. El i9900 ofrece un alimentador incorporado de la hoja que pueda manejar hasta 100 hojas de 17 libras. acción, 10 sobres, 30 hojas de la transparencia, o una gama completa de los papeles de la especialidad. Incluso viene con un paquete de la muestra del papel de la foto de 4 by-6-inch favorable.
La conexión directa de ofrecimiento a las cámaras fotográficas digitales directas o PictBridge-compatibles del jet de la burbuja o a los camcorders de DV, el i9900 también ofrece USB rápido 2.0 y los interfaces del FireWire (FireWire compatible con el OS del Mac solamente) para la conexión periférica conveniente. Viene con un paquete comprensivo de la imagen que corrige software, incluyendo la Fácil-Impresión fotográfica más, Fácil-WebPrint, ZoomBrowser EX, PhotoRecord, ImageBrowser, y PhotoStitch. (Véase espec. del tech para los requisitos del sistema.) la unidad es movida hacia atrás por una garantía de un año en piezas y trabajo.
Cuál está en la caja
impresora de la foto i9900, cabeza de impresión i9900, tanques de la tinta (BCI-6C ciánico, magenta de BCI-6M, amarillo de BCI-6Y, negro de BCI-6Bk, foto de BCI-6PC ciánica, magenta de la foto de BCI-6PM, rojo de BCI-6R, y verde de BCI-6G), cable eléctrico, instrucciones fáciles de la disposición, kit del documento (guía rápida del comienzo, tarjeta del registro, software setup y guía del usuario, CD del software), paquete de papel de la muestra de la foto favorable; cable de la impresora no incluido
¡1 EXCEPCIONAL!!!! ¡Cuando compré esta impresora, sabía iba a batir mi Photosmart anticuado 7660 de CABALLOS DE FUERZA, pero no sabía que iba a darme un photolab entero en mi oficina!!! ¡ROCAS de este freakin de la impresora!!! El color produce los golpes cualquier cosa que he visto, incluso viniendo de un favorable laboratorio. ¡Todavía estoy intentando calcular hacia fuera cómo vienen las fotos hacia fuera mirando como se laminan o algo, porque salen muy brillante sobre la foto entera!! ¡Si tu adentro el mercado para una impresora profesional de la calidad, esta bestia está para ti!! ¡RECOMENDAR ALTAMENTE!!!!!
2 comenzó hacia fuera a sorprender, pero no más Cuando primero compré esta impresora, me sorprendieron con la calidad de las impresiones. Soy fotógrafo aficionado en el lado, y utilizaba esta impresora para mi pequeño negocio. ¡Emocionaron, y así que eran I a mis clientes!
Entonces, 3 meses más adelante, la calidad de las impresiones comenzadas para deteriorar, y yo podíamos considerar vendas horizontales en cada cuadro. Canon hizo que condujera una hora y una mitad a un taller de reparaciones, que lo hice. Un mes completo más adelante, aún ninguna palabra en qué se encendía. Resulta, ellos nunca calculó hacia fuera qué causaba el problema. Tan Canon me envió una impresora restaurada. Bien, 3 meses más adelante otra vez, el mismo problema.
¡No importa cuánto limpia I las cabezas, el etc., las vendas todavía está allí!
¡Ahora, acabo de querer a envío la parte posteriora de la cosa del dang y consigo un reembolso!!
He perdido a tan muchos trabajos y clientes debido a esta impresora. Deseo que nunca comprado te.
3 más que mí esperé… Compré recientemente Canon I9900 después de que mucha investigación y yo no podríamos ser más felices… esta impresora sea mucho más que esperé de cualquier impresora de la foto… que casi no tengo gusto de utilizarla para los carteles simples y cualquier cosa pero las mejores fotos él están a bueno para eso y estoy pensando en conseguir una impresora más barata para mi negocio para las cosas menos complejas… si apenas deseas algo imprimir algunas fotos de la familia o el uso para los aviadores de la venta de garage no consigue esta impresora… mientras que es lo hace el software con el cual viene de la buena mirada de las fotos de las marcas gran las grandes fotos soy mejor bastante seguro que viene con la mayoría de la foto del canon impresoras… tan a menos que estés buscando la calidad 13 del estudio " x 19 " me imprimas repitas no pases el dinero en esta impresora que es demasiado bueno para la foto media… verás cada defecto y si la resolución de la foto es baja, cada pixel… Pero, si deseas la impresora ancha de la foto del color del formato de la mejor calidad menos de la gama de precio de $1000.00, que esto está la impresora para ti… que está bien digno de el dinero para el fotógrafo serio y el diseñador gráfico… y como yo dicho mucho más que esperé
impresora de la calidad de 4 profesionales…
Ahora he tenido mi i9900 por aproximadamente seis meses. Me todavía sorprenden en la calidad de las impresiones que salen de ella. Tiro a las fotos con Canon EOS-1d Mk II. Es tan dado que ayuda a tener una cámara fotográfica que pueda utilizar la capacidad de la impresora. Poblar que demuestro que las impresiones a no puede decir la diferencia entre un laboratorio real de la foto y las impresiones de i9900. Una palabra del consejo, el mejor papel a utilizar con esto es papel de la foto de Canon favorable. He intentado las otras marcas de fábrica y papel de la foto de Canon más. Ningunos de ellos tienen absolutamente el sacador que lo hace el favorable papel. Cuando tienes una cámara fotográfica alta del magapixel, un favorable papel, y el i9900, está al lado de imposible producir una mala foto. Oh, una más cosa. Utilizo solamente mi i9900 para las fotos. Tengo una impresora del seperate para los documentos y tales. Solamente imprimiendo las 8.5 x 11 fotos borderless en el favorable papel, puedo hacer un promedio de 50 fotos por cada par de tanques ciánicos de la tinta de la foto en el i9900. No utilizas los otros colores tanto durante la impresión de la foto. Esos dos tanques de la tinta costaron cerca de $12 por cada uno. Puedes conseguir tan 50 fotos hermosas de la página llena para $24-$25. No malo en todos.
5 un dolor de cabeza importante Si compruebas en el Internet, encontrarás que ésta es la mejor impresora del mundo - para los meses primeros. Entonces los problemas comienzan a demostrar, el más grande de cuál es un problema de las bandas - vendas débiles a través de cualquier área del color sólido. Puedes hacer la “limpieza profunda frecuente” para conseguir librado de ellos para un cortocircuito mientras que pero cuenta en substituir muchos de cartuchos de la tinta apenas para eso usado en los procedimientos de limpieza. Canon quisiera que condujera un de medio día para llevarlo adentro un centro de servicio. Sí a la derecha. Su ayuda del teléfono es sin valor.
Amarás esta impresora inicialmente y te darás 5 estrellas, pero espera justa algunos meses. He tenido siempre Epsons pero pensado intentaría este nuevo modelo snazzy. Lo amé - durante algún tiempo. Ahora es una pesadilla.
6 salidas i9900 las mejores impresiones de A3+ A menos que Canon introduzca una impresora nueva de A3+ este año, la búsqueda costosa para una impresora de la tinta del formato grande que pueda producir las fotografías apenas tan muy bien y alisarlas como la mejor impresora de la teñir-sublimación/de la difusión pudo haber terminado. Los pros y contra se basan en una comparación entre el i9900 y las impresoras i9100 que ese I posee.
PROS i9900
1. mejoró abisagró el resto de papel y la extensión de 3 pasos
. guía de papel de funcionamiento del smoother 2
3. mejoraron la extensión de papel de la salida de 3 pasos
. portada mejor asegurada 4
5. vueltos a poner y panel vuelto a clasificar según el tamaño de la operación
6. dirigen la conexión portuaria de la impresión con las cámaras fotográficas digitales específicas
USB 7. dos (2.0 y 1.1) y puertos posteriores de un FireWire 400
8. más bajos en altura por 14 milímetros
9. colorean más de par en par gama
10. más reservados que el i9100 en el modo no-Reservado
. más rápidamente salida 11 de fotos
12. imágenes que miran menos más grainier
13. detallaron más explosiones
14. 768 inyectores por el color (dpi 1200) contra 512 para el i9100
15. a excepción de la foto ciánica, especificaciones de Canon indican, y es verdad, que todos los tanques de la tinta durarán más de largo que las mismas tintas usadas en el i9100
. disposición fácil de la hacia fuera-de--caja 16
17. como el i9100, texto coloreado negro es muy buenos para los curriculums vitae y AutoCAD imprime (puedes tener que trampear tu PC cargada AutoCAD en la creencia de que está imprimiendo a Hewlett-Packard un trazador para mantener tu línea ajustes)
CONTRA i9900
1. agregó costo en llenar 2 tanques adicionales de la tinta con las tintas de Canon (las especificaciones de Canon indican, y es verdad, que las tintas rojas y verdes durarán más de dos veces mientras sea ciánico)
2. 1.5 kilogramos más pesado (una no-edición si las estancias de la impresora introducidas un punto durante él son curso de la vida y tu escritorio no está ya cerca de derrumbamiento)
3. más de par en par por 4 milímetros (ningún reparto grande a menos que tu tablero del escritorio sea ya apretado en el área superficial)
la guía rápida del comienzo de 4. i9100 mejor clarifica con las ilustraciones en cómo determinar el mejor patrón del listado por columna al realizar la alineación principal simple (la queja de menor importancia)
5. El disco de la solución de BJ substituyó PhotoStitch (que estaba disponible con el i9100) por la foto de la puntada que es solamente compatible con las cámaras fotográficas digitales de Canon con ayuda de la puntada
. la escala coloreada gris oscura de la guía de papel 6 es difícil de leer que la escala en colores claros en el i9100
7. 2 manejaron el bolso plástico que contenía la impresora pueden rasgar al levantar la impresora del cartón por primera vez
El i9900 es más tacaño en la tinta, más rápida hacer salir impresiones vibrantes más lisas, y es total un diseño mejorado sobre el i9100.
i9100 + modo vivo de la foto es aproximadamente una muesca menos vivo que el i9900 sin modo vivo de la foto. Evitar de overusing el modo vivo de la foto en el i9900 en tonos de la piel. A excepción de la cabeza a los retratos del pecho, otras fotos exhibirán mirar rojizo de los tonos de la piel artificial. El modo vivo de la foto trabaja bien con los paisajes que traen hacia fuera los azul, los verdes, los rojos y los amarillos.
Encima de comparaciones cercanas de 8 " las imágenes idénticas de la muestra de x 10 desnudos " en un minorista de la foto producido con iP5000 y el i9900 de Canon demostraron que hay poca diferencia si (a mi ojo) detalladamente y el grano en imágenes produjo por el iP5000 9600 x 2400 1 cabeza y el i9900 4800 x 2400 del picolitre cabeza de 2 picolitre. Los 5 tanques de la tinta del color de las imágenes de iP5000 carecieron el contraste (sacador) de los tanques de la tinta del color de i9900 8.
Incluso en comparación con el competidor más fuerte de Canon, Epson, sus imágenes idénticas pigmento-entintadas de la muestra del formato grande no estaba como detallado ni más rico liso, mejor en color que el i9900. La cabeza de la impresora de Epson utiliza una diversa tecnología y produce resultados que miran naturales excelentes.
El i9900 puede imprimir solamente hasta 13 anunciacióces " impresión de x 19 ". Significando, ningún tamaño de la bandera (13 " x 44 ") que imprime como el Epson más versátil. Puedes llamar Canon y conseguir su razonamiento en esto. ¿Canon no quisiera quizá que el i9900 compitiera con su W6200 24 " ajustó a formato de par en par la impresora 1200 x 1200 del jet de la burbuja de la tinta del color del dpi 6?
Un Noritsu QSS-3011 no es. Pero, basado en el tinte e imágenes pigmentadas de la tinta outputted en febrero de 2005 del mejor de Hewlett-Packard, Epson, Lexmark e incluso iP5000 de Canon, el i9900 (en mi opinión) hace salir las imágenes más lisas y más ricas.
7 un problema importante Realmente no tenía un problema con esta impresora hasta que comencé a imprimir cuadros con muchos de negro en ellas. Se parece haber muchos de rayas descoloradas a través de cada cuadro que no se pueda eliminar con un inyector limpio. Puesto que he comenzado a imprimir cuadros más oscuros con negro en ellas, esta impresora es básicamente sin valor a mí. Estoy buscando actualmente una diversa impresora.
8 puedo sumar esto para arriba con una palabra -- ¡ULULACIÓN!!! Canon i9900 me hizo amor para imprimir otra vez. Había sido un usuario leal bonito de Epson -- mi impresora más última era el Epson 1270. Pero después de perder muchos de documento y de tinta costosos sobre una base regular futzing alrededor con las cabezas de impresión estorbadas y otras ediciones de Epson, comencé a mirar alrededor para ver qué más ahora estaba hacia fuera allí. Investigué e investigué e investigué. Finalmente coloqué en el i9900 y era justo como cada uno dicho -- muy fácil instalar; todo trabajó a la derecha fuera de la caja; y los cuadros están atontando.
Canon i9900 me hizo amor para imprimir otra vez. He caído más que cientos dólares en el papel y él de Canon son algo del mejor dinero que he pasado siempre. Una vez que veas el producto final todo se convierte digno de él -- el dinero que pasas en tu engranaje de la cámara fotográfica, el tiempo inviertes esperar el tiro perfecto, las horas incontables viertes sobre tu cultivo y corregir de la PC -- la vale. Canon i9900 me hizo amor para imprimir otra vez.
9 la única impresora que necesitarás por varios años venir. Tenía el i9900 por varios meses y buscaba una impresora del formato grande capaz de las hojas 11X17 así que puedo imprimir mi lista. He estado utilizando una aguja 600 de Epson por varios años y he venido apreciar la calidad de la impresora aun cuando que estaba necesitando la limpieza principal frecuente y ninguna manera viable de unclog algunos inyectores. Miraba esta impresora y el Epson 2200 pero elegí Canon debido a él soy tecnología reemplazable del jet de la cabeza y de la burbuja de impresión. El jet de la burbuja diferencia forma otras impresoras de la inyección de tinta porque se calienta la tinta de modo que forme burbujas de la tinta encima de la página, por lo tanto la velocidad y la exactitud de la impresora pueden ser alcanzadas. He probado otras impresoras de la inyección de tinta de la foto y las fotos de estas impresoras son muy similares, pero debido a Canon que usa impresiones de la tecnología del jet de la burbuja de la impresora salir seco, mientras que algunos de las otras necesitaron hora de secarse. Había algunas veces al imprimir en la vitela donde no estaba seca la tinta. Otra más es calidad normal y la mejor calidad en esta impresora no tiene ninguna diferencia sensible y la única queja es que no hay tintas archival. He pasado hasta ahora casi a través de un sistema entero de tintas, puesto que yo imprimen principalmente negro, que el cartucho era el primer a ir, entonces magenta de la foto y la foto ciánica. Calculo que tendría que substituir el negro, la foto ciánica, y la magenta de la foto tres veces antes de que todos los otros cartuchos se substituyen dos veces o aún una vez para verde y el rojo. La gente que ha comparado una foto del i9900 y del exacto la misma foto de un laboratorio de la foto no puede percibir la diferencia solamente cuando ella dice la parte posteriora de la foto ella vio la diferencia.
¡10 esta impresora es ABSOLUTAMENTE INCREÍBLES!
¡Imprimí mis primeros cuadros apagado de esta impresora sobre el fin de semana y toda lo que puedo decir es “ULULACIÓN”! La calidad de los cuadros es mejor que CUALQUIER COSA yo ha considerado de un laboratorio profesional o esperado de una impresora de la foto. He utilizado solamente el papel de la foto de Canon favorable hasta ahora así que no puedo decir como de bien otros tipos de Canon de medida del papel de la foto para arriba. Todas las revisiones y descripciones que leo antes de comprar esta impresora son verdades. La recomiendo ALTAMENTE a cualquier persona que esté mirando para imprimir las fotos de la calidad del mejor-que-profesional de un ordenador personal. ¡ESTO ES TAN BUENO COMO CONSIGUE!
Instalación 11 Pues estoy escribiendo esto estoy escuchando cuánto los cuidados de Canon (registrados por supuesto) ..... después de que pase las horas de 1 1/2 que intentan instalar el software que llamé, y realmente conseguí un ser humano - provechoso pero no bien informado. Después de su gasto 2 horas su conclusión era que debe ser la manera que mi disposición de Vaio PCG-GRT100P debe prevenir la instalación. Canon es el único software de la instalación que rechaza funcionar en mi máquina de Sony. Ahora waitiing en la gente del explorador….consiguieron yep aspirado en un 9950F. Las 2 estrellas están para un pisapapeles bonito ..... todavía que escucha cuánto cuidan… el huh del uh
12 hasta ahora. ¡Sooooo bueno! Compré el i9900 hace aproximadamente dos semanas. Deseé “utilizar encima” los papeles brillantes de mi foto de Epson, de Ilford y de Kodak antes de que comprara el papel brillante de la foto del cañón…. Así pues, imprimí un manojo de la foto.
¡Apenas me sorprenden en la calidad de las impresiones! ¡No puedo incluso imaginarme cómo es fantástico me sentirá bien la calidad de impresión una vez compra los papeles brillantes de la foto de “Canon”!
Ésta es la mejor impresora que he poseído siempre.
También me sorprenden que el color de la “impresión”…. empareja casi perfectamente el color en mi monitor…. (y havent de I incluso fijada las preferencias con todo).
Nunca he poseído una impresora que empareja el color del monitor tan effortlessly.
Parar el investigar….apenas salir y comprar esta impresora. No serás dissapointed.
13 esto es la impresora derecha para los blow-ups grandes Conseguí recientemente esta impresora enseguida después de Años Nuevos. Hice que alistara para salir de la caja en 45 minutos aproximadamente. Todo fue flawlessly, no había sorpresas o mensajes de error.
Imprimí algunos paisajes (13x19) y los retratos (8 1/2x11) borderless, y la velocidad es verdad asombrosa. Un 13x19 en 3.5 minutos del punto golpeaste el botón de impresión.
La calidad de las impresiones en el papel de la foto de Canon favorable es verdad asombrosa. ¡Infact, las impresiones miraba mejor que ampliaciones que tenía de las mismas impresiones hechas en un laboratorio! Los algoritmos de Canon para el retiro vivo de la foto y del ruido son bastante buenos, ellos no interfieren con la calidad de la imagen original mucho, con excepción de hacer a lo que se suponen.
El alto-punto era cuando mi esposa cerró para arriba después de quejarse del alto coste, cuando ella clamó contra que los cuadros miraban mejor que calandrar. Y eso debo hacer un calendario, que no soy.
Todavía tengo gusto de los portaits que consigo en el Epson 785EPX usando el papel de Epson Colorlife, el mismo retrato en Canon era un poco saturado también para mi opción. Haré tan probablemente los retratos en el Epson.
Con respecto a uso de la tinta, me sorprendieron ver que el nivel de la tinta se hubiera movido apenas después de tres 13x19 y un 8 1/2 x 11 imprime.
Pienso que esta impresora está realmente digno de él, especialmente para los paisajes, o en las impresiones donde importa el tamaño de la impresión realmente. Estoy alegre yo escogí éste para el tamaño sobre Canon Pixma 8500 que utiliza el mismo printhead.
14 soportes de Canon detrás de sus productos La impresora de Canon i9900 era toda que esperé y más. Las fotografías impresas son iguales a, si no más agudo, que la película comercialmente desarrollada de 35m m. Mi razón principal de esta revisión es elogiar la ayuda técnica y la comisión de Canon a la satisfacción de cliente. Tenía un papel de la estera de la foto del cargamento 13x19 del problema. Después de Canon que entraba en contacto con vía E-mail, era instrucciones puntualmente proporcionadas de corregir el problema. Después de que estos procedimientos fueran intentados sin éxito, entré en contacto con otra vez Canon. Me aconsejaron que tenía una opción a llevar mi impresora una facilidad de la reparación o a utilizar programa instantáneo del intercambio. Elegí el más adelante y una impresora nueva llegó mi hogar en el plazo de dos días. La impresora nueva no tiene ningún problema con el papel de la pulgada 13x19. Recomiendo altamente a este producto y compañía para tu foto que imprime necesidades
¡15 Canon golpean la marca otra vez!!! Después de años de usar Epson y las impresoras de los CABALLOS DE FUERZA, compré Canon i900D alrededor de hace un año. Me sorprendieron simplemente en los resultados y juré que no podría haber una impresora que remató la calidad y el color de las impresiones. Bien, era incorrecto. El i900D es gran impresora, pero el i9900 es realmente un paso arriba con colores más ricos y más rápidamente la impresión.
La disposición es muy fácil. Cuando consigues todo de la caja, encajar a presión simplemente el printhead hacia el sostenedor y cargar los 8 cartuchos de la tinta. Después del software y de los conductores se cargan, tú necesitará hacer una alineación de la cabeza de impresión. ¡Básicamente, eso es él! Imprimí mi primera foto en menos de 15 minutos a partir del primera ajuste él para arriba. ¡Los cuadros vienen hacia fuera verdad sorprendiendo! La adición de los tanques verdes y rojos de la tinta realmente ayuda a hacer la mirada de los colores más rica.
Una cosa que he tenido gusto siempre sobre las impresoras de Canon es la facilidad de empleo ambas en la disposición, los sistemas de la tinta, y la semejanza impresa de los colores a cuál está en la pantalla. Los conductores de la impresora de Epson y de los CABALLOS DE FUERZA necesitaron muchos de trabajo de conseguir a los colores la derecha justa. Con Canon i9900, no hay el pellizcar de los conductores de la impresora necesarios. Los colores salen casi idéntico a lo que estás mirando en la pantalla. Conductor “de uso fácil” muy fácil de la impresora para esta máquina.
No puedo acentuar este bastante… allí no soy simplemente NINGUNA MANERA que un laboratorio de la foto puede producir cuadros mejores que qué esta impresora imprime. ¡No estarás absolutamente dissapointed con esta impresora!
16 Canon contra Epson…. Y el ganador es… ¡CANON! ¡En gran medida!! Leído en….
Tiro para la aplicación de ley federal y el protector nacional del aire; He manejado una oficina de servicio del formato grande. He impreso en muchos, muchos diversos dispositivos de salida para incluir la lambda de Durst, Encad IJ, jet de alta fidelidad de Roland, impresoras laser, Fuji Pictrography, dispositivos de la Teñir-sublimación, más muchos más. Digo todo el esto para validar mis comentarios que sigan…
¡El fondo es el i9900 sopla todos ausentes! Esto incluye un Epson 9600, 7600 y 4000 que utilice para los Feds y los militares. La única caída es la carencia de tintas “Archival”. Me lamenté entre el Epson 2200, y el i9900. ¡No lamento un minuto la decisión i9900! ¡Es absolutamente magnífica! Ahora las necesidades de Canon de conseguir en el carro de la banda de música archival de la tinta, y ellas no serán golpe. ¡Tiro a Canon 10D para mi trabajo personal, de que juntado con las imágenes/las impresiones irreales, soplo de las marcas i9900 de estas impresiones las mentes de todos mis pares! No pueden creer la calidad. Trabaja con Epson, Konica/Minolta, y los papeles rojos del río perfectamente. El papel brillante de Konica QP es muy agradable, sin “broncear”, como las tintas pigmentadas Epson.
¡No puedo decir que la impresora esté funcionando realmente hasta que veo la mudanza de papel, él sea ésa silenciosamente!
Las caídas serían la trayectoria de papel que no es una trayectoria recta de la alimentación, y las tintas que no son archival. La trayectoria de papel no ha presentado un problema en fecha todavía, pero intentaré un poco de papel de arte y soy seguro que estrangulará. Espero ser probado mal en ese pensamiento. Aunque con el aspecto archival pienso que en 8-10 años en que estas impresiones esperan descolorarte, habr3e estado a través de varias impresoras y la tecnología será untouchable y apenas las reimprimiré según lo necesitado. Hasta la venta de las impresiones, pozo me dará una oportunidad de revender impresiones en el futuro… quizá. Veré abajo del camino si se descoloran realmente.
¡Espero que esto te haya ayudado a hacer la decisión derecha… el i9900!
Entrarme en contacto con si tienes cualquier pregunta más otra.
BaysidePhotoImaging@yahoo.com
Dennis
17 increíble ¡TODA LO QUE PUEDO DECIR ES COMPRA ÉL!!! SU DIGNO DE CADA PENIQUE. Si imprimes el alot de fotos grandes pagará sí mismo. La tinta se parece soportar bien.
18 Nothing Short Of Superb
Doing photography for a living means producing high-quality prints at the end. Now I know what you're thinking...why would a professional protographer use a $500 printer? Well, first of all, I do have a much larger, MUCH more expensive printer in the studio, but for many applications, this printer does an exceptional job. I've printed out portrait packages, wedding packages, publication work, pictures on exibit, and have produced high-quality results every time.
I was a die-hard Epson user until the Stylus Photo 2200 turned into such a disappointment. So this time around I decided to give Canon a try and so far it's been a great move. OK, so it takes up a lot of space on the desk...it's a 13 X 19 printer, of course it'll take up a lot of space. Cost per print from my calculations isn't as bad as some because of the separate ink tanks. I know full well that with the Epson five color cartridges that when you run out of magenta (which is usually the first to run out along with cyan) that the other chambers have sufficient ink in them for several more prints, but you're throwing that out because of the other two colors. As far as paper goes, there arent a lot of surface choices from Canon, but I ran tests on several different papers and I've managed excellent results on all of them. The Epson paper seems to do the best as far as other manufacturer's paper goes, but I've had great results with Ilford paper. Ilford has settings on their website for the i9900 for each of their papers. Even the cheapo Epson paper from Costco (125 sheets for $20) does a good job for doing the snapshots where expensive paper isn't needed.
You won't go wrong with this printer. Well worth the cost.
19 Does not disappoint
This printer is phenomenal! Print speed is incredible--printed 4x6 prints in 33seconds, and I didn't appreciate significant noise during the process. Colors are vibrant and resolution is crisp. Set up was effortless, at least in my opinion. Also nice to see that Canon included some 4x6 pro paper inside.
Upon arrival from UPS, the box did sustain significant damage during delivery. I was a bit worried, but no printer damage was visible. Kudo's to Canon for doing a great job on packing.
Cost is high, but I've already invested a significant amount of $$$ into my digital equipment. After all is done, its the print that ultimately matters.
The size of the printer is rather large. My HP Laserjet ended up going on the floor to accomodate the Canon printer.
Overall, I have been very happy with the printer and can't say that I have any complaints or concerns at this time.
20 Knock, knock. Who's there? The printer of your dreams!
Absolutely phenomenal print quality! That's what it all comes down to and this printer, by far, produces the best quality prints I've ever seen. The colors just jump right off the paper.
Usually the old axiom, "garbage in, garbage out" holds true the majority of the time, but I've printed out some relatively crappy pictures (not mine of course
) that have looked decidedly non-crappy once 'transmogrified' by this printer. Of course, this won't work miracles, but it will allow you to get the best possible results from whatever your photographic labors have been. So if you spend a great deal of time and effort in composing and exposing your photos, then play with them for hours in Photoshop to eek out just the right tonal balances and colors, it really is a shame to print it on some run of the mill bargain printer. I was so impressed by this printer that I've gone back and reprinted all of the photos that I had in my house. Photos that I had previously thought 'perfect'. After reprinting them on the Canon, they really are even 'more' perfect. :-)
I've been doing photography now for over thirty years. I've seen some relatively revolutionary changes in photography over that time, but until now I've lamented the fact that you couldn't get a proper color print outside of the darkroom. This printer changes that. Which is an entirely good thing because color printing in the darkroom is a major PITA (+/- 1 degree tolerance in your chemicals, CYMK filtering, etc..).
I've gone through quite a few inkjets over the past six or seven years and was, until recently, very pleased with the output from my HP 5550. I knew it wasn't top of the line, but for $99 a year ago, it was quite good. Then I got to thinking about all the time, effort and money I was spending on producing photographs, only to print them out on a so-so printer. I did extensive research and narrowed down my choices to the Canon i9900 and the 8450. Both use the _identical_ printhead and inks, but the 8450 only handles letter size paper and smaller. For an extra $150 I decided on the i9900 so that I could handle 13x19 and smaller. Well worth the extra money. The first huge 13x19 print you make of your favorite photo will convince you as well.
Okay, enough blathering, here are my impressions:
PROS:
- unreal color quality
- 8 ink cartridges. 8 separate colors are responsible for the outstanding color, but also allow you to replace only the color cart that runs out (not only environmentally sound, but also saves you some coin in the long run).
- FAST print speed
- Relatively straight paper path (can handle heavier weight papers and doesn't mangle the paper)
- Exceptionally quiet
- I've only used Kodak, Ilford and Canon papers, but the print quality was extremely similar on all of them. I've not had it long enough to comment on the fade-resistance, but Canon claims 25+ years.
CONS:
- BIG footprint. Once you have the input paper support and output tray folded out, it's like a satellite with its solar panels unfurled. Front to back is 34 inches. That's right, just two inches short of a yard. 23 inches wide sounds small in comparison. 14 inches deep with the solar panels folded up isn't bad, but you do need to unfold them when you print. This thing gives new meaning to desktop printing - you need an entire desk for it.
- Pricey. Perhaps I've just been spoiled by sub $200 printers, but it is a big leap to lay out $500 for an inkjet. Quality-wise, it seems exceptional. And of course, the end result of amazing prints is well worth it if you can afford it. And when you consider that I've spent over $2K on digital cameras and lenses, $4K on my Mac G5 and accessories, etc.., it seems silly to cheap out where the "rubber meets the road".
- I don't quite understand the need for a duplexing system on this type of printer. I would rather have that as an option and pay less for the main printer.
- Black and white prints just don't seem as good as darkroom results for the same picture. I believe this could be improved if Canon were to rewrite the drivers for this printer, but for now, I'm continuing my search for a good b&w inkjet.
So in conclusion, I really love this printer. Canon has really taken the lead in the photo-printing market and I can't see anyone else catching up anytime soon.
[...]
21 Great Printer
I have had my i9900 for about three months and love it. Super quality photos, especially like the 4x6 prints. Prints super 8x10's as well...Buy extra Photo magenta and photo cyan ink if you print alot of pictures, and I do mean alot of pics. Ink lasts a long time. I am very very happy with my purchase. Best photo printer for the money.
22 Canon Photo printer i9900, WOW WOW.
It tells you that is Lab quality, I been taken pictures for years, this machine its better than some Labs that I got pictures from, way above my expectations!!!!!!!!, don't hesitate to buy it.
23 Photo lab quality in all sizes!
Now that I've been using this printer for several months I can say that it has far surpassed my expectations. Photos as large as 13" x 19" print in photo lab quality. The "Easy Photo Print" application is simple to use and by checking the "Vivid Photo" and "Photo Noise Reduction" boxes improves color and sharpness immensely. I can't imagine why I'd ever get a photo processed by a photo lab ever again.
The printer was simple to install and those that complain in other reviews about the paper loading problems and discolored images must be doing something wrong. It all works flawlessly.
Thank you Canon for giving me what I've been hoping from digital photography for years.
24 WOW!!! The print quality, speed and clarity are outstanding!
I have owned this printer for about 2 months now and it is AMAZING! The quality of the prints from my nikon d70 and this printer is simply unbelievable. The 13x19 prints are great. This printer is quiet and fast too, when I first used it i thought it was broken because I could not hear it and then a minute later there was a borderless 8.5x11 print. For anyone who has images that are high enough resolution to deserve this excellent printer, buy it! You will not regret it!
25 WOW!!!!!!!!
WOW...no more going to one of those photo stations to do your photos. This printer is beyond awsome. I can't believe the awsome picture quality. I love...yes love this printer...I will no longer need to get my family photos done at a portrait studio. I am taking them my self at home with my awsome Cannon 20D SLR Camera and printing them out on my Cannon i9900 printer. I LOVE IT!!!
26 After Three Months I'm Still Impressed
I've had my i9900 since it first came out and I love it! Before this I had two Epson photo printers and was happy with them at the time but everything about this printer is better... The print speed is incredible, I haven't had a clogged head yet (Epson owners will appreciate this), the individual ink cartridges are economical, and the print quality is phenomenal. Although I print more 4x6's than anything, I've made several 13 x 19 prints and they look great. Genuine Canon ink cartridges can be bought for about $10.00 each if you shop around a bit. They last a reasonably long time and are a snap to change.
I only have two quibbles with this printer and neither is serious enough to affect its five-star rating... It doesn't print on CD's and you can't make a borderless 8 x 10" print (you can make a borderless 8? x 11" but my Epson handled both sizes).
I can't speak to print longevity yet but I don't expect it to be a problem. I never used Epson's archival inks & papers and have not noticed any fading of those prints, even after 3-4 years hanging on my wall. I expect that prints made with the i9900 will be equivalent, which is fine with me. I don't sell my prints so if in ten years a print has faded, I'll simply make a new one.
One last thing... Although I usually don't recommend using paper from anyone but the manufacturer of the printer, I've found that Epson's Premium Glossy Photo Paper works fine with this model. You get a very slight shift toward yellow when compared with Canon's best paper but can be easily adjusted out if desired. I mention this because I print a lot of 4x6's and Epson's 100 pack of their best glossy paper (S041727) is quite a bit cheaper than even Canon's mid-line paper. Also, although the glossy surface on the Epson and Canon papers are near identical, the back of the Epson paper is smoother than the Canon's, making the prints slide easier (and feel better) in your hand. This is a small thing but you may want to give it a try.
If you're looking for a wide-carriage photo printer, there's a lot to like with this one.
27 Wow just doesn't say enough...
My last printer was a Canon 7000 which has worked wonderfully for many years now but it takes forever in comparison to print out a full page 300dpi image (almost 10 minutes!). Since I wanted something faster and had great luck with Canon I thought I would stick with them. I looked at each of their consumer printers and like what I saw with the i9900. When I got it I printed several pictures and was just awestruck by the quality of the images printed. After that I wanted to see exactly how detalied a picture it could print out. So I put the digital camera on the tripod and zoomed out as far as I could (optically). I took a series of overlapping photos and then put them together in Photoshop to make one huge photo. I printed it out at 600dpi and was even more amazed!! It was like looking at the same scene in reality. I have never seen such incredible clarity from a printer before. This was even printed out on the "Kirkland Signature? Glossy Photo Paper 125 Sheets" from Costco (about $19).
28 Wow!
Great results and easy set up. As nice as any standard processor will give you. Very, very pleased! I love it, and compared to the Epson price in the same quality range, it was a good buy.
29 Great printer.
I've had this printer since it was first stocked at compusa. so far, its's been an amazing inkjet printer. I previously owned epsons (3000, 2200) which required lots of maintainance such as frequent head cleaning, tweaking with color profiles to get color matching, and having a designated computer as RIP print server. Canon is easy--direct connection to my computer via FireWire (or USB1/2). Straight out of the box, photo prints had relatively good color matching to what I see on my Apple Cinema display. Colors were a bit warmer and more saturated than what I would prefer. But they were still very good. It prints quietly and very fast (especially compared to Epson 2200 & 3000) . I wanted to get precise color matching to what I see on my screen. It took me about an hour to calibrate my monitor, set up color profiles, and adjusting only the color intensity on the Canon printer and printing with my custom color profile to get the colors nearly perfect.
I saw that some complained about the ink cost. Canon uses 8 inks and will run you about a hundred dollars to get all 8. BUT...it rarely uses Red and Green. Photo colors (PCyan, PMagenta) seems to run out pretty fast. If you have photoshop you can always adjust the color distribution in CMYK so that the printer uses more ink from black but and not from the four process colors. I looked at the prints under a loop and found that 2-picoliter droplets stay on the surface of the page. It seems like a lot of ink does not go on the page but they are tightly held together to produce excellent color and definition. Anyway, the cost of printing on this Canon is no more than Epson 2200.Text printing is so-so if you are printing direclty to the printer. It isn't as tight and defined like printing through RIP. BUT. you can emulate this effect and get near perfect text printing by saving your doc as a PDF and then printing the PDF file. The result is amazing! Anyway, it's an excellent printer. Get to know it well and it will treat you well.
30 A long time to wait for yellow pictures!!!!
Originally the order for this printer was placed on the first of September. The order wasn't shipped until the 7th of the month. Recieved the printer on the 15th of September (2-3 day shipping!!!!). I said to myself Bad Karma.
Hurried back from work to set-up the printer and install the associated software. After a number of unsuccessful attempts to install the software (only partial installation)I called tech support. This was the best experience of the night since the gentleman on the other end of the phone was an american who spoke english that I could understand!
After two and one half hours on the phone with him we were only able to install "most" of the usable applications for the printer. I said to myself Bad Karma!
Next night my wife asked me to print some pictures from our vacation which I told I would only print when I got the "good" printer. Much to my suprise when the first picture came out of the printer, the faces of the people looked as though they had jaundice. I tried to manually adjust the color but to no avail.
Once again I called the friendly people at tech support and asked for their advice. After a couple of tests and adjustments nothing changed. His advice was for Canon to send out a new printer head. Once again Bad Karma and a waste of time.
This was my first large purchase from Amazon.com and to date has been way less than a positive experience.
Now I can't say that Amazon.com was responsible for the printers malfunction, however if I had purchased this unit closer to home and the identical events occured I could have rectified the problem two weeks ago.
It would have cost me more money (approximately $100.00 more) but when you factor in the lost time and hours spent e-mailing Amazon I would have gladly bought close to home.
So the saga hasn't ended yet. I'll continue my review when the new printer head is delivered 7 days from now! Bad Karma!!!
31 Over priced ink and faulty feeds ruin another Cannon
What needs to be pointed out is that yet again Cannon has set up an ink system that cost me more money than any other printer out there except the Lexmark's of the world. The number of photo prints you get for your money is ridicliously low. I felt jipped out of my money. Then the gravity style feed started feeding pages wrong by leaving these little white lines up either side of the page, so not only am i paying too much for my prints, but im printing non-useable prints then also. Does any one else smell a conspiracy?
32 Just Great
This i9900 is fun it makes you want to keep printing photos they are great looking Dont wait Just buy one, you will have some happy days, Before I got mine Iwent to canon cite and downloaded the software, its great I had every thing ready wen the printer arrived . Iguess thats it , gonna print some more pohtos
33 SKIP, an OLD PRO.PHOTOGAPHER from fremont,ca.
I did a lot of research before buying the CANON i9900.But it was
worth all the time i spent.This is the best PHOTO PRINTER i have
ever seen.For the money,it's simply the best.I ran a test for color quality as soon as i had it hooked up,(witch by the way was a snap) it is fantastic, the color is as good as or better then most photolab's.I also tested different brands of paper.the
best print was the one useing CANON PHOTO PAPER PLUS GLOSSY.But the prints with other paper were not bad ,but with CANONS paper
the color jump's off the print at you.If you are into photography you will love this printer,boy i sure do.
34 What a printer!
I will make this short. I was skeptical about the price but even my wife says it is sooo worth the money. Print quality is absolutely superb! 8 cartridges about 11 bucks apiece but you won't believe how long they last (buy an extra photo magenta and photo cyan; they were the first to go). Printed some pix from the Canadian Rockies and was just blown away. Even printed 11x17 photos from my old Nikon 3megapixel camera. Unbelievable.The software that came with it was great too. Very easy to merge 3 pix into a nice panorama. If your thinking about buying it, STOP. Just do it. You won't be sorry.
35 Nice printer...BUT no USB or Firewire cables included
My initial impression is that this is a very good printer that produces unusually high-quality photo prints for a printer in its price range. However, I have given the product only a 2-star rating, because I am frustrated and angry that Canon failed to include the cables that are needed to hook up the printer to a computer. To explain this problem, potential buyers should know that this printer connects via either a USB cable or Firewire, but unlike every other printer manufacturer I'm familiar with, Canon includes neither. To make matters worse, the USB cables I own do not fit the USB port on this printer, and Canon has provided no documentation about the precise type of USB cable that's needed. In an effort to solve this problem, I spent upwards of an hour looking around on Canon's technical support website, but it contained no helpful information. Exasperated, I finally called a tech representative, who immediately recognized the problem. Apparently it is among the top reasons why customers call tech support when they're installing their printer. So stop for a moment and think about this and its implications about Canon. Canon is either so cheap and/or so stupid that they would rather pay a tech rep $20 bucks to field calls about this problem than to spend $5 to put the right cables in the box in the first place. And even though this is apparently one of the leading reasons why customers call for support, Canon still won't bother even to document it on their website. That says a lot about Canon. But wait, there's more ugliness to come! So the tech rep tells me that I need a USB cable that has a "Type 1" connection on one end and a "Type 2" connection on the other. Great! Except that it seems that no one in the universe of USB manufacturers has ever heard of a Type 1 or 2 USB connector. Once again, Canon is operating in its own little universe, where it is completely detached from the real world and from its customers. I finally solved the problem myself, and for what it's worth, potential buyers should know that the USB cable that worked for me is described as having an "A Plug" on one end and a "B Plug" on the other. This terminology (A & B Plugs) is apparently standard among USB manufacturers (but shhh!...don't tell Canon!) Oh! You should also know that this printer supports both high-speed USB 2.0 and the slower USB 1.x standard. So if your computer supports USB 2.0 and you intend to use it, then be sure you buy a USB cable that clearly states that it is a "USB 2.0 Device Cable". Good luck! As I said, this looks like a very nice printer, but it is utterly appalling that Canon totally botches the setup process by fumbling these cable issues. Reminds me of the old story that for want of a nail, the shoe was lost and for want of a shoe... (you can find the rest on the web, if you want it).
36 Semi professional photographer loving the 9900
I was so reluctant to spend anything over $200 for a printer with all of the online printing services out there. I started getting more work and realized that my clients demanded the proofs and prints quicker which pushed me into this market. Like everything else, due diligence was done and it came down to Canon vs Epson. I must say, I may be biased as all my camera gear is Canon but I have no regrets. This baby rocks and she is sexy too! The first thing my wife said, after she saw its size, was wow it is sleek and neat isnt it. Then she heard it print, or more importantly, didnt hear it print. Its silence is of course an added bonus. The setup is very simple and the prints are fabulous. No regrets from this user. Of course, as a Mac user, I love the firewire interface. Dont think about buying this baby, just go for it.
37 A great printer
What a great printer. I pulled it out and read the instructions first. I had no problems installing the drivers. After running though the setup process and performing an alignment test I was ready to print. I used the high speed USB and that went without a problem. I was ready to print my first picture. I decided to use my drum scanned picture for a test. It was a 100 Megabyte TIFF file. Open the file in Photoshop and printed it to an 8x10 sheet of Canon Pro paper. The print quality was impeccable. I was amazed of the quality of print. I compared it to a LightJet print I had made from that same file. The LightJet print had a greater Dmax (deeper blacks, and from 1" away had greater visual resolution). However the LightJet 8x10 print cost me $25.00. I estimated the cost of the i9900 8.5x11 print cost me about 2 bucks and is very close in quality. Behind a glass frame and the difference is even harder to recognize. I think I'll save my money from now on and print from the i9900 printer. The quality is truly photographic. I even made prints from 1 MB Jpeg's that were scanned at Wal-Mart. I turned on image optimizer and was even more amazing how well it can print from such a small file. I was expecting pixilation, but that wasn't existent. It must have interpolated the picture and with great results. Again those looked like photographs too. I used Kodak paper and Canon paper. The Kodak glossy paper was OK. It didn't produce the same results are Canon. Canon paper was far better. I would stick to Canon paper for quality, which is why you're looking at this printer right? If you want your own digital photo lab at home, the i9900 is for you. You will not be disappointed. One interesting note, why did someone post there e-mail address below on the web and claim to be a computer professional? I guess in 10 years they never heard of spam.
38 Faulty Paper Handing - Faulty Installation disks
I have been a computer professional for 10+ years and understand how to install equipment and software. After unpacking the printer I read through the documentation and followed the step by step instructions. During driver installation twice the cdrom failed with cab errors on two different drives. I could not complete the registration due to errors. It was impossible to kill the installer in W2K. It just wants you to register no matter what. I had to reboot my system.After installing the driver (ignoring errors) I put approximately 15 sheets of office max ultra bright 24lb inkjet paper into the feeder, and adjusted the guide. It ate the paper several times, twisting and tearing the edges and feeding it crooked.
I re-adjusted the paper - this time using only two pages in the feeder. When trying to run the maintenance utility it started to complain about an unauthorized ink tank... sigh... I re-seated the ink tanks and the head.
Eventually I was able to run the head alignment utility but the feed was still crooked. I must have a defective unit. I read through their recommended papers and saw the printer will not handle anything over 24lbs unless it is Canon paper. Eh... I'm returning it for another Epson. I have a feeling that this particular model will be finicky about paper handling. I was very disappointed that I experienced so many problems out of the box. I read on other sites similar problems with defective paper handling. I do not think this device deserves a five star rating.
39 Amazing print quality!
I just printed some 13 x 19 prints on Canon Pro paper -- they look like they came from a lab. I'm amazed with the quality, ease of use (their stand alone printing utility is great - my wife loves it!), quietness and speed of the unit. I had no idea it was so fast --- I was after best quality I could get, and this is a step ahead of the Epson 2200 or R800, the Canon i960 etc. I was replacing an Epson Photo 1200 and until I came across this printer I had trouble finding a printer that met all of my requirements: high quality, bordless, large format, no CF slot or LCD display (printing from my file server).Really, I cannot find any fault with this printer, setup was simple, but the proof of the pudding is in the output, and the prints are stunning, even on the mid-level "Plus" paper.
Glenn
40 Fast & Excelent Photo Printer for the money
I replaced my aging, broken Epson 1270 printer with the Canon i9900. I was fairly happy with the Epson, but the i9900 is close to perfect. The quality of graphics and photos on any paper is very good, even at the standard quality setting. Full page letter sized photos print in just over a minute. The drivers work flawlessly on both my PC and Mac, with Photoshop and Illustrator. The only time the printer seems slow is when printing web pages and text with the draft settings, it is only a little faster that the standard setting, but not as fast as a few year old HP DeskJet 970 in draft mode. The ink seems to go a long way too, the Photo Cyan & Magenta ink tanks seem to be the only ones that need to be replaced. All the other colors of ink seem to last twice as long.
41 Exceeds Canon's brag
I've come across very few products that perform up to what its manufacturer claims for them. This printer far exceeds in the quality of its output what even a blessed publicist could write about it. "Uncanny!" is the word. What the unit gives me would challenge even the best a processing lab could do. I had one problem, which turned out to be of my own making and a result of my not sufficiently trusting the i9900. To get a letter-sized print took me 30 minutes. I kicked my computer, punched it, cursed at it, and was even thinking of unplugging it as punishment. I had duitfully scanned my film negatives (and slides), sized and massaged them through Photoshop; then saved them as JPEG, and turned the file over to i9900 to print.
Canon's estimate of 50 seconds for letter-sized--hey, it took me 30 minutes. Yet, you know--the output was worth the wait. Last night I woke up with the answer. The i9900 wants to do all the work--enlarging and massaging. To ask it to go to Photoshop is downright insulting, except to get the JPEG save. So I gave the Canon a JPEG and said, "Okay, it's yours!" In 50 seconds I got a photo even my wife gasped at.
So, please, don't buy the unit! I want my genius to be proclaimed.
42 Some Canon printer tips
Anyone with a Canon printer can easily refill the tanks if you go to cfriends.com and get the right refill kit. These inks work very well and printing costs will drop dramatically. I have used them for years with no problems.
To get a good match between monitor and print, make sure all your profiles are in the right places and Color Settings, if you have them available in your Photo App, are set correctly.
I use a MAC G5, Photoshop CS and a Canon S900 with great success thanks to Canon's superior support of OSX.
43 Good job Canon!
What a wonderful product! Can you say excellent printing! My photo retouch project came out better than the original! This printer is definitely worth the money! Can't say enough good things about it!On the negative side, the printer shipped had a defect in the autopaper foot feed. Every sheet no matter whether 20lb, glossy, matte photo, didn't matter - it chewed up. Contacted Canon and had perfect customer service experience with the exchange!
I highly recommend this printer and Canon's customer service that came with this product!
44 Incredible printer
I bought it the day I could get a hold of one, and it paid off in spades. It's fast as blazes, prints gorgeous photos and high-speed text... absolutely amazing and worth every penny.
45 Well done!
First i9900 delivered to me had serious problems with paper feeding: jam on each second large format print, noticeable distortions and other defects of output on others at the beginning of printing while paper gets into properly. Canon replaced the printer within a week, thanks to them. Replacement works fine. I printed about 15 images in 13x19 size and a few smaller ones. Images were taken by Sony F717 camera and were of 5 and 3 MP size. No enhancements or editing were used, only best images, perfectly looking on screen were selected. 1. I had problems with printer driver installation (eMachines PC, Windows XP Home edition). Gauge of driver installation program shows 60% when it fails to continue. Fortunately, printing is possible - the necessary parts of driver were installed.
2. Color rendering may be better. It tends to add a little bit of extra violet tone. Colors are less bright than expected. Difference of how prints look on monitor and on paper are noticeable and it is impossible to predict them. However, no doubts, printed images are very good.
3. I compared prints on Canon "Glossy Photo Paper" and on "Photo Paper Pro". "Pro" - paper is much thicker, multilayered promising better prints. I am not sure about that because "Pro" paper is not so white as simple thin and twice cheaper "Glossy" so output on "Pro" is not so juicy. To ensure this, simply compare these two kinds of paper.
4. I estimate ink expense for 10 13x19 images as 3 ink tanks, so each print comes to $5-$7, rather well. However, expenses in future in not often occasional usage should be bigger because ink dries in all ink jet printers, requiring cleaning of nozzles.
5. Five MP images look very detailed, I would say that they are significantly better than may be expected from traditional 24*36 mm films. Even prints 3 MP images are very good showing no visible granularity.
6. Printer is noiseless, relatively small, very fast and easy to use - though these features are not very important, this should be mentioned.
Overall conclusion: this is a remarkable printer and it appears that it has no competitors, except, maybe, more expensive but less good by specifications Epson 2200. It is interesting to compare them. My suggestion to all serious photo amateurs with high demands looking for large format printer is "buy". It is very interesting to revise a review after, say, half a year. First tests on fresh printer and ink can say nothing about ink discoloration, print head life, etc.
46 Incredible printer!
I just purchased the Canon i9900 inkjet, and I just can't restrain my enthusiasm- it's absolutely amazing! Literally within 15 minutes of getting it all set up I had several beautiful prints, including a gorgeous 13x19 incher. I had owned a very competent, but older, Epson photo printer (870), but I really wanted something that would show off the abilities of my digital SLR (Nikon D70-love it, by the way), and this printer certainly seems to do that. Unbelievable detail, perfect color, the ability to go big, and no flaws in image quality that I can see. I am certainly not a professional photographer (amateur hobbyist), but the only excuse I have now for poor pictures will be my own lack of ability.The only concern I had about the Canon over the Epsons was its ability to print black and whites, but it seems to be doing a beautiful job with those as well. Admittedly, I have not tried it with all the papers, but I can vouch wholeheartedly for the Photo Paper Pro and the Plus Glossy papers. I haven't had it long enough to comment on lightfastness or longevity. And yes, it is amazingly fast- a thing you may not even appreciate until you live with it a while. It makes the printing process so much easier and enjoyable that I anticipate printing a lot more (I'm sure to Canon's delight!). If you own a higher-megapixel camera you just haven't lived until you've seen your pictures really sharp and really huge.
Pros:
-Image quality
-Speed
-Price (esp. compared to the Epson 2200)
-Image size
-It's a handsome devil
Cons:
-Clunky paper feeding (but actual printing is very quiet)
-Price (compared to regular-sized printers)
-Not really sure where I'll find a 13x19 frame (?)
Can't comment yet:
-Ink costs
-Satisfaction with other papers
-Longevity and lightfastness (but the way I figure it, if it fades in a couple of years, I'll print out another one!)
-Software (so far, so good)
47 Excellent, fast, quite
This printer makes stunning prints very quickly. P 13" x 19" high quality print takes under 3.5 minutes on my computer. The printer is not only fast but it is also very quiet.I was worried that it did not come with a 4x6 card feeder like the i960, but I loaded a set of 10 4x6 pages and printed 8 4x6's without any paper feeding issues.
The borderless printing is excellent and the ink management seems to be pretty good. So far with 3 13 x 19 high quality prints on glossy paper and around 20 4 x 6 and 5 8.5 x 11 prints, 7 out of 8 ink cartridges seem to be more than 85% full. Photo cyan looks to be around 70% full (as I would expect) so consider buying 2 of those.
I highly recommend this printer.
48 Awesome, truly awesome
I purchased this printer as soon as it was released as I had high hopes from reading reviews beforehand. Boy, am I impressed. The first thing I noticed when I yanked this puppy from the box was that it is simply elegant. This is not a printer to shove in the corner on the floor; display it well and keep in mind that it is fairly large--13 x 19" capability will do that to a printer. Anywhoooo, I yanked my tired looking epson 890 from the shelf and livened up the area with the 9900. Setup was quick and easy, unless you're tremendously naive when it comes to computers...but even then, the instructions seem pretty dummy proof. I immediately printed out a borderless 4 x 6 print. Holy mother of g-d, this printer is fast! Compared to my old epson, it's a mile down the raceway while the epson is just starting the ignition. Vroom vroom. I think the print took less than 40 seconds. Ya can't beat that...anywhere; likewise, a borderless 13 x 19 took something like 2 1/2 minutes. Once again, it smokes the competition. The prints looked excellent and I wasn't even using Canon paper, it was epson. I would recommend, as canon says, to use their goods with their goods.
Well, let's see...what else...ah yes, ink. 8 ink cartriges reside within the printer, an addition of 2 from last years model. The more the better is what I say. Of course, more cartdridges=more money, but from the looks of it, canon inks and paper remain relatively affordable compared to other brands.
Look at the price of the printer for pete's sake! Retails for $500 bucks? The epson 2200 which has similar capabilities is $700...nuff said.
If you're looking for a fast, affordable and georgeous piece of technology, you can't go wrong.
Happy Printing.
49 Canon will put photo labs out of business...
This is the most awesome printer! If you have a good high megapixel camera your photos will look just like they came from the photo lab, or maybe even better. The photos come out extrememly vibrant in color. It is incredibly fast, this is just an amazing printer. I printed out at least five 8x10's and a few 4x6 photos right away, and the ink tanks still look full. I was skeptical about spending this much money on a printer and it not meeting my expectations, it exceeded my expectations. I would highly recommend getting this printer if you are into photography. I was also very impressed with the Easy PhotoPrint software this came with. The Easy PhotoPrint software works very well. I can't say enough good about this printer. I'm very impressed.
